Lately there have been reports about a starvation catastrophy - people are very close to starving to death! Now I wonder - and you may call me stupid here - what is the difference between someone "starving to death" and someone who's "suffering from a starvation disaster"? Both of them have no food to eat. Does one of them chew grass and the other live in the desert? And how do we know that he or she doesn't chew on palmtrees?
I get that for someone in an office with somewhere who has no problem what so ever attaining something to eat this is a very interesting question, but let's be honest here. The people without the food won't care if they're "starving" or "almost dead from starvation", they still won't have any food. What actually bothers me even more are all the celebrities who're singing songs and donating money. Yes, "well done Slytherin, well done Slytherin", but since most of it ends up in some corrupt dictator's pockets it won't matter much how much you donate or how many songs you sing. And even if it didn't end up there - I really doubt that a starving family would have much joy out of money. I'm pretty sure that it's not god for the digestive system. What I do about the starvation in the world? Not a damn thing - they don't do anything for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment